NFL fans are voicing concerns over what they perceive as a double standard in the league’s responses to different forms of player self-expression. The spotlight is currently on Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker and former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick, with critics drawing stark contrasts between the NFL’s reactions to each.

Colin Kaepernick | National Football League, News, Scores, Highlights,  Stats, and Rumors | Bleacher Report

Earlier this month, Butker drew national attention for his controversial remarks during a commencement speech at Benedictine College. As the commencement speaker, Butker condemned abortion rights, Pride Month, and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. He also encouraged female graduates to embrace the “vocation” of homemaker. This speech quickly sparked widespread backlash, prompting the NFL to distance itself from Butker’s comments, emphasizing that they were made in his personal capacity and did not reflect the league’s views.

“The NFL is steadfast in our commitment to inclusion, which only makes our league stronger,” read a statement from the league. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell added, “We have over 3,000 players. We have executives around the league that have a diversity of opinions and thoughts just like America does. I think that’s something that we treasure, and that’s part of, I think, ultimately what makes us as a society better.”

Harrison Butker 'homemaker' speech sparks backlash - BBC News

However, several social media users were quick to highlight what they saw as hypocrisy in Goodell’s handling of Butker’s remarks compared to his response to Kaepernick’s protest. In 2016, Kaepernick began kneeling during the national anthem to protest racial injustices in America. Goodell’s initial public comments on Kaepernick’s form of protest were critical, emphasizing the need for “respectful” methods of enacting societal change.

“I think it’s important if they see things they want to change in society, and clearly we have things that can get better in society, and we should get better,” Goodell said at the time. “But we have to choose respectful ways of doing that so that we can achieve the outcomes we ultimately want and do it with the values and ideals that make our country great.”

As Kaepernick’s movement gained momentum, with more players joining in, Goodell directed NFL teams that “everyone should stand” during the national anthem. He noted that the anthem controversy was hindering honest conversations and real progress on the underlying issues, expressing a desire to move past the controversy together with the players.

Colin Kaepernick Thought the NFL's Planned Workout Set Him Up to Fail - The  Ringer

Despite opting out of his contract with the 49ers in 2017, Kaepernick has remained unsigned by any NFL team. Many believe that his political views led to his being blacklisted by team owners. In the summer of 2020, amid a national reckoning on racial issues, Goodell released a statement acknowledging the league’s past failures in addressing racism and listening to players.

“We, the National Football League admit we were wrong for not listening to NFL players earlier and encourage all to speak out and peacefully protest,” Goodell said.

The disparity in Goodell’s reactions to Kaepernick and Butker has not gone unnoticed. Critics argue that the NFL’s commitment to inclusion and diversity appears inconsistent, pointing to the league’s more lenient stance on Butker’s controversial speech compared to its handling of Kaepernick’s peaceful protests. Social media is rife with comments highlighting this perceived double standard, reflecting a broader frustration with the league’s approach to player activism and expression.

As the NFL continues to navigate its complex landscape of player expression and social issues, the calls for a more consistent and equitable approach grow louder. The contrasting cases of Butker and Kaepernick underscore the ongoing challenges the league faces in balancing its public image, player autonomy, and commitment to social justice.