Megyn Kelly Criticizes Prince Harry’s Involvement in Documentary on Illegal Activities

In a recent statement, media personality Megyn Kelly expressed her skepticism about Prince Harry’s participation in the upcoming ITV documentary “Tabloids on Trial,” which aims to expose illegal activities in the British tabloid press. Kelly questioned the Duke of Sussex’s credibility, pointing to allegations that he destroyed evidence related to his own legal battles. Her indifference toward Harry’s intentions has sparked a broader debate about his role in the fight against media malpractice.

The documentary, set to air on July 25, features prominent figures like Hugh Grant, Charlotte Church, and Paul Gascoigne alongside Prince Harry. The program intends to shed light on the unlawful tactics used by some British tabloids, such as phone hacking and invasive surveillance. Harry has long criticized the British media, blaming them for the relentless intrusion into his and his family’s private lives. His mother, the late Princess Diana, and his wife, Meghan Markle, have both been frequent targets of tabloid scrutiny.

Harry’s legal battles with the media are extensive. He has initiated multiple lawsuits against various publishers, including Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) and Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN). In one of his most high-profile cases, Harry accused ANL of unlawful information gathering, including the use of listening devices and obtaining personal information deceitfully. ANL has denied these allegations, calling them “preposterous.”

Despite Harry’s vocal stand against media malpractice, Kelly’s criticism stems from allegations that he destroyed evidence in a separate legal case against News Group Newspapers (NGN). In this lawsuit, Harry claimed journalists and private investigators unlawfully gathered information about him. However, NGN’s attorney Anthony Hudson accused Harry of destroying text messages that were crucial to the case. This allegation has led to questions about Harry’s integrity and whether he can genuinely advocate for transparency and accountability in the media.

Harry’s battle with NGN is set to continue, with a trial expected to start in January 2025. His legal team has dismissed NGN’s accusations as a “classic fishing expedition,” arguing that Harry has fulfilled his obligations regarding evidence disclosure. Nonetheless, these allegations have provided fodder for critics like Kelly, who question the prince’s moral authority on issues of legality and press freedom.

In addition to his legal battles with the media, Harry has also faced scrutiny over his lawsuit against the Home Office regarding his security arrangements in the UK. After stepping down from royal duties, Harry contested the decision to reduce his security, a case he ultimately lost. The judge ruled that the decision was rational and justified, adding another layer of complexity to Harry’s public image as a defender of justice and personal rights.

Kelly’s indifference to Harry’s involvement in “Tabloids on Trial” echoes a broader skepticism about his motivations. While Harry portrays himself as a victim of media malpractice and a champion for change, his actions and the allegations against him paint a more complicated picture. Critics argue that his participation in the documentary may be more about personal vendetta than a genuine desire for reform.

As “Tabloids on Trial” approaches its air date, the public will be watching closely to see how Prince Harry addresses these controversies. The documentary’s success in shedding light on the darker aspects of the British press may ultimately depend on whether viewers can separate Harry’s message from his personal legal entanglements. Whether he can maintain his stance as a credible advocate for media reform remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the scrutiny he faces is unlikely to dissipate anytime soon.