Grizzly bears are coming back to Washington’s North Cascades.
The National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced Thursday a decision to actively restore the animals in the region, where they lived for thousands of years. The last confirmed sighting of a grizzly bear in this area was in 1996.
The plan is to move three to seven grizzly bears from the Rocky Mountains or British Columbia every summer for five to 10 years until reaching a population of 25 bears. The goal is a population of 200 bears in 60 to 100 years.
There’s no timeline yet for when the bears will be moved into Washington, but federal officials will publish updates as they are finalized, according to the Park Service.
“We are going to once again see grizzly bears on the landscape, restoring an important thread in the fabric of the North Cascades.” Don Striker, Superintendent of North Cascades National Park Service Complex, said in a statement.
Thursday’s decision follows a decadeslong debate over the best way to bring back the bears to the North Cascades. The most recent push, which the federal government started in 2022, drew more than 12,000 public comments, many with concerns over the bears’ effect on humans, livestock and other wildlife in the area.
U.S. Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican who represents Washington’s 4th Congressional District, which encompasses parts of the North Cascades region, has been a critic of the plan.
Newhouse called the latest decision “outrageous” and “misguided.”
“While it was my hope that NPS and USFWS would listen to the will of concerned of residents in the affected areas, this administration is, once again, disregarding local public opinion and instead catering to the whims of coastal elites and the out-of-touch environmentalist lobby, which has been rushing to finalize this plan since its inception,” he said in a statement.
Grizzly bears are considered a threatened species in the lower 48 states under the federal Endangered Species Act. There are about 2,000 grizzly bears outside of Alaska. In the 19th century, there were an estimated 50,000 in the U.S., but their numbers dropped into the hundreds by the 1930s, mostly because of killing by humans.
Under the new plan, the bears in the North Cascades would be considered a nonessential experimental population under the Endangered Species Act, which the Park Service said will provide authorities and land managers additional tools for managing the population.
This means that the bears will be treated as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act but eases some of the regulations normally associated with endangered species. For example, the management of black-footed ferrets, also considered a nonessential experimental population, makes harm done to the animals during traditional land management legal, giving landowners the ability to continue managing their property without fear of violating the federal law.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will release its final rule for managing grizzly bears as a nonessential experimental population in the coming days.
The designation is based on “extensive community engagement and conversations about how the return of a grizzly bear population in the North Cascades will be actively managed to address concerns about human safety, property and livestock, and grizzly bear recovery,” said Brad Thompson, state supervisor for the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
News
Elon Musk Makes Headlines with Bold Call to Ban ‘The View’: “Why Does Musk Want ‘The View’ Off the Air? Sparks Debate Over TV Preferences”
‘The View,’ a famous daytime talk programme, has Elon Musk’s strong displeasure, an audacious statement that has created debates nationwide. Taking to social media to air his grievances, the software mogul—who is notoriously forthright and unafraid of controversy—said that he…
Breaking News: Jon Voight and Angelina Jolie Join Forces to Launch Traditional Values-Focused Production Studio—What Inspired This Unexpected Collaboration, and How Will It Impact Hollywood’s Narrative Landscape?
In a noteworthy development, renowned Hollywood figures Jon Voight and Angelina Jolie have teamed up to launch a new production studio dedicated to upholding traditional values and moving away from contemporary woke ideologies. This initiative arises as dissatisfaction mounts within…
Elon Musk Confronts Beyoncé, Demanding She Cease Singing Country Music or Face Consequences—What Prompted This Clash Between Two Iconic Figures, and What Could the Ramifications Be?
In a surprising turn of events, tech entrepreneur Elon Musk and music icon Beyoncé have found themselves at odds over artistic expression and genre boundaries. The clash unfolded publicly after Beyoncé launched her new country album titled “Cowboy Carter,” which…
Daniel Radcliffe Addresses Potential Role in New Harry Potter TV Series Reboot Amidst JK Rowling Feud—What’s His Stance, and How Might This Impact the Franchise’s Legacy?
Published 12:55 23 May 2024 GMT+1 Daniel Radcliffe has spoken about his future in the Harry Potter TV shows amid his ongoing feud with creator JK Rowling The Boy Who Lived is seemingly keeping his spell book shut when it comes…
Taylor Swift Faces NFL Ban: What Led to This Decision, and How Will It Impact Her Relationship with the League?
In a stunning announcement that has taken both the music and sports worlds by storm, Taylor Swift has been banned from attending all future NFL games. The decision, reportedly made by NFL officials, cites the pop superstar’s presence as “too…
Breaking News: Bud Light Announces Closure of Locations Amid Boycott—What Prompted This Decision, and What Does It Mean for the Future of the Company and the Boycott Movement?
A Strategic Contraction Amid Crisis: Bud Light Announces Closure of Multiple. The ripple effects of Bud Light’s recent marketing missteps continue to impact the brand, with the beer giant now announcing the closure of multiple locations. This decision marks another…
End of content
No more pages to load